Actual finance blog

August 20, 2011

Bank of America to cut 3,500 jobs

Filed under: economics, money — Tags: , , , — Professor Besto @ 10:16 pm

CHARLOTTE, N.C.,

August 15, 2011

Stiritz bets shareholder value record will keep ConAgra at bay

Filed under: Uncategorized, economics — Tags: , , , — Professor Besto @ 11:48 pm

When a deep-pockets acquirer meets a reluctant target, a few more dollars will often turn “no” into an enthusiastic “yes.”

That’s not the case with Ralcorp, a St. Louis company that has just slammed the door in its suitor’s face for the third time.

ConAgra Foods, the Omaha, Neb.-based maker of Orville Redenbacher popcorn and Peter Pan peanut butter, wants this deal badly. It approached Ralcorp in March with a cash-and-stock offer of $82 a share, which it sweetened to $86 in May and to $94, all in cash, last week. The latest bid values Ralcorp at $5.2 billion.

Ralcorp has refused to even meet with ConAgra, and Chairman William Stiritz sent a letter on Friday saying the two companies “have nothing further to discuss.”

Just saying “no” isn’t usually an effective takeover defense, but Stiritz, when he’s not writing rejection letters, has moved to reshape Ralcorp by spinning off the Post cereal business and acquiring a unit that makes private-label bread dough.

Analysts say the dough deal will add to profits from Day 1, but the spinoff’s success is less certain. Ralcorp is betting that its two parts

August 11, 2011

Today

Filed under: Business, economics — Tags: , , , — Professor Besto @ 6:12 am

The Toronto stock market fell back Wednesday as fresh worries about the European debt crisis helped stop a short-lived rally in its tracks.

The S&P/TSX composite index dropped 77.3 points 12,032 and the junior TSX Venture Exchange gained 8.69 points to 1,719.92.

August 2, 2011

Debt-limit bill passed, on its way to Obama

Filed under: economics, term — Tags: , , , — Professor Besto @ 9:42 pm

The Senate emphatically passed emergency legislation Tuesday to avoid a first-ever government default, rushing the legislation to President Barack Obama for his signature just hours before the deadline. The vote was 74-26.

Obama planned to sign the bill promptly and also was making remarks at the White House.

Tuesday’s vote capped an extraordinarily difficult Washington battle pitting tea party Republican forces in the House against Obama and Democrats controlling the Senate. The resulting compromise paired an essential increase in the government’s borrowing cap with promises of more than $2 trillion of budget cuts over the next decade.

Much of the measure, which the House passed Monday night, was negotiated on terms set by House Speaker John Boehner, including a demand that any increase in the nation’s borrowing cap be matched by spending cuts. But the legislation also meets demands made by Obama, including debt-limit increases large enough to keep the government funded into 2013 and curbs on growth of the Pentagon budget.

“We’ve had to settle for less than we wanted, but what we’ve achieved is in no way insignificant,” said Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. “But I think it was the view of those in my party that we’d try to get as much spending cuts as we could from a government we didn’t control. And that’s what we’ve done with this bipartisan agreement.”

Many supporters of the legislation lamented what they saw as flaws and the intense partisanship from which it was forged. In the end, it was a lowest-common-denominators approach that puts off tough decisions on tax increases and cuts to entitlement programs like Medicare.

“What troubles me about it is that the bipartisan compromise also represents a kind of bipartisan agreement by each party to yield to the other party’s most politically and ideologically sensitive priority,” said Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn. “In the case of Democrats, it’s to protect entitlement spending. … In the case of Republicans, it’s to not raise taxes.”

The measure would provide an immediate $400 billion increase in the $14.3 trillion U.S. borrowing cap, with $500 billion more assured this fall. That $900 billion would be matched by cuts to agency budgets over the next 10 years.

The Senate vote was never in doubt after Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and McConnell signed on. But like Monday’s House vote, defections came from liberal Democrats unhappy that Obama gave too much ground in the talks, as well as from conservative Republicans who said the measure would barely dent deficits that require the government to borrow more than 40 cents of every dollar it spends.

“This is a time for us to make tough choices as compared to kick the can down the road one more time,” said freshman GOP Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas.

The measure sets up a fall drama that promises to again test the ability of Obama and Republicans to work cooperatively. It establishes a special bipartisan committee to draft legislation to find up to $1.5 trillion more in deficit cuts for a vote later this year. They’re likely to come from such programs as federal retirement benefits, farm subsidies, Medicare and Medicaid. The savings would be matched by a further increase in the borrowing cap.

There’s no guarantee the committee, to be evenly split between the warring parties, will agree on such legislation. But there are powerful incentives to do so because more budget gridlock would trigger a crippling round of automatic cuts across much of the budget, including Pentagon coffers.

And questions linger about the effect the grueling political free-for-all will have on the U.S. credit rating.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told ABC News that he didn’t know whether the debt-limit fight would cause America’s AAA credit rating to be downgraded. “It’s not my judgment to make,” he said. Geithner also said he fears world confidence in the United States was damaged by “this spectacle.”

Enactment of the measure provides welcome closure for Obama, who has seen his poll numbers sag during the debt-limit battle.

GOP presidential candidates such as Mitt Romney and Michele Bachmann issued statements opposing the legislation.

“As with any compromise, the outcome is far from satisfying,” Obama conceded in a video his re-election campaign sent to millions of Democrats.

In a tweet, the president was more positive: “The debt agreement makes a significant down payment to reduce the deficit _ finding savings in both defense and domestic spending.”

Source

August 1, 2011

Roseman: How banks can make customers happy

Filed under: economics, news — Tags: , , , — Professor Besto @ 9:36 am

When TD Canada Trust started opening branches on Sunday, I thought it wasn’t a big deal. Many bank branches stay open on Saturday for weekend help.

TD obviously knew what it was doing. In a survey of customer satisfaction, it ranked highest among the Big Five banks and widened its lead, compared to previous years.

The decision to open 300 Canadian branches (a quarter of its network) on the seventh day helped TD’s score jump to 780 out of 1,000 points — ahead of RBC, at 751 points.

Customer expectations are changing, according to Lubo Li, a senior director at J.D. Power & Associates, who led the research.

People wonder why only banks and government offices aren’t open Sunday. They believe it’s time to abandon “bankers’ hours.”

Each Big Five bank has a distinctive strength in giving value to customers, Li says.

RBC excels in “share of wallet,” which means finding ways to induce you to buy more products. Advice in the branches leads you to move your business there — and your family’s business, too.

BMO is innovative in using social media, ranking third with 741 points and moving ahead of Scotiabank (with 729 points) in the annual survey.

“Over 60 per cent of retail bank customers — including boomers and retirees — use social media, such as Facebook. It’s a great tool for communicating with your customers,” Li says.

Scotiabank is known for supporting charitable events, such as Toronto’s Caribbean Carnival, and doubling its wealth-management operations with the purchase of DundeeWealth Inc.

CIBC, fifth in line with 721 points, is narrowing the gap as a leader in mobile banking.

It’s offering younger customers an iPhone app to manage their money on the go.

“During the past year, all major banks in Canada have invested heavily in upgrading their customer-facing systems and processes, which has resulted in higher satisfaction,” J.D. Power said in a news release.

It’s great to see Canada’s banks use their profits to make customers happier. Before the 2008 credit crunch, they used their profits to make shareholders happier with annual dividend increases savings account payday advance.

Customers of Big Five banks stay with them for more than 20 years, Li says. This is quite different from the fickle customers in the United States.

Among mid-sized banks, President’s Choice Financial actually tops TD with a 786-point score. It’s ranked highly by customers because of low fees, clear account information and strong products.

ING Direct didn’t make the survey because the sample size was too small. With the launch of its Thrive chequing account last January, it should score highly next year.

(J.D. Power uses online responses from almost 13,000 customers who use a primary financial institution for personal banking.)

Do banks fail their customers in some areas? What brings down their scores?

Satisfaction with fees declined significantly among big and mid-sized banks and credit unions, Li says. Many raised fees, but did a bad job of explaining why fees were going up.

“People don’t like surprises. Sending a letter to customers about higher fees isn’t enough,” he says. “Using generic terms, such as ‘maintenance fees,’ isn’t enough. Banks need to use better communication.”

Problem resolution also shows growing dissatisfaction. Customers report a higher rate of unresolved problems and a lower rate of problem resolution after the first contact.

Here’s advice arising from the survey:

  Be a smart shopper. Make sure you understand fees and discounts that may apply to you.

  Focus on the quality of advice from a bank. Don’t accept one-size-fits-all recommendations that don’t meet your needs.

  Ask regularly about new products or services your bank offers. You could miss out on ways to manage your money and get useful benefits unless you pose the questions.

Ellen Roseman writes about personal finance and consumer issues. You can reach her at eroseman@thestar.ca.

Source

July 25, 2011

Players vote to OK deal to end NFL lockout

Filed under: economics, technology — Tags: , , , — Professor Besto @ 9:45 pm

The NFL Players Association executive board and 32 team reps voted unanimously Monday to approve the terms of a deal with owners to the end the 4 1/2-month lockout.

Owners overwhelmingly approved a proposal last week, but some unresolved issues still needed to be reviewed to satisfy players; the owners do not need to vote again.

The sides worked through the weekend and wrapped up the details Monday morning on a final pact that is for 10 years, without an opt-out clause, a person familiar with the deal told the AP on condition of anonymity.

Owners decided in 2008 to opt out of the league’s old labor contract, which expired March 11. That’s when the owners locked out the players, creating the NFL’s first work stoppage since 1987.

NFLPA head DeMaurice Smith stepped outside of the group’s headquarters in Washington at about 2 p.m. to announce that players approved the pact.

“I know it has been a very long process since the day we stood here that night in March,” Smith said. “But our guys stood together when nobody thought we would. And football is back because of it.”

As he spoke, Smith was flanked by NFLPA president Kevin Mawae, Saints quarterback Drew Brees, Colts center Jeff Saturday and Ravens defensive back Domonique Foxworth, key members of the players’ negotiating team instant payday loan lenders. Brees is one of 10 plaintiffs in the antitrust lawsuit that players filed against the league.

Moments later, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell walked into the building, joined by owners Bob Kraft of the New England Patriots, John Mara of the New York Giants and Jerry Richardson of the Carolina Panthers.

“I believe it’s important that we talk about the future of football as a partnership,” Smith said.

A tentative timeline would allow NFL clubs to start signing 2011 draft picks and rookie free agents on Tuesday. Conversations with veteran free agents also could start Tuesday, and their signings could begin Friday.

Under the proposed schedule, training camps would open for 10 of the 32 teams on Wednesday, 10 more on Thursday, another 10 on Friday, and the last two teams on Sunday.

Both sides set up informational conference calls for Monday afternoon to go over the details of the agreement. The NFLPA told player agents they would be coached in particular on the guidelines and schedule for signing free agents and rookies; the NFL alerted general managers and coaches they would be briefed in separate calls.

Source

July 12, 2011

RIM facing challenges, CEOs tell shareholders

Filed under: Finance, economics — Tags: , , , — Professor Besto @ 11:52 pm

WATERLOO, ONT.

July 9, 2011

Flat jobs data signal weakest recovery in decades

Filed under: Prices, economics — Tags: , , , — Professor Besto @ 8:40 pm

The job market is defying history.

A dismal June employment report shows that employers are adding nowhere near as many jobs as they normally do this long after a recession has ended.

Unemployment has climbed for three straight months and is now at 9.2 percent. There’s no precedent, in data going back to 1948, for such a high rate two years into what economists say is a recovery.

The economy added just 18,000 jobs in June. That’s a fraction of the 90,000 jobs economists had expected and a sliver of the 300,000 jobs needed each month to shrink unemployment significantly.

The excruciatingly slow growth is confounding economists, spooking consumers and dismaying job seekers. Friday’s report forced analysts to re-examine their assumption that the economy would strengthen in the second half of 2011.

They had expected improvement in June after a bleak jobs report for May. They figured that hiring in May had been artificially weakened by temporary factors _ a run-up in gasoline prices to $4 a gallon and factory disruptions caused by Japan’s earthquake and nuclear crisis.

But the June numbers were even worse than May’s, even though gasoline prices are falling and factories revving up again.

“This is a remarkable, across-the-board backslide,” says economist Heidi Shierholz of the Economic Policy Institute.

Sometimes disappointing economic reports look better on closer inspection. This one gets uglier.

Workers’ hourly pay fell in June. They worked fewer hours. And 16.2 percent of those who wanted to work were either unemployed, forced to settle for part-time jobs or had given up looking for work. That figure was up from 15.8 percent in May.

Among the frustrated is Cris Cohen, who was laid off in April from a job as a contractor for Cisco Systems in Raleigh, N.C. He’s been searching for work since then, futilely combing job listings, reaching out to friends and setting up a website with a resume and a blog.

“In the past when I’ve left jobs or been laid off, I’ve just contacted connections I have had, and that’s led to opportunities,” says Cohen, who has a wife and a 9-year-old son. “Now it’s just seems much more dry…. There’s just always that anxious feeling, that nausea.”

One problem is that after slashing jobs during the Great Recession, employers are still reluctant to replace them. They’ve learned to squeeze more work and revenue out of reduced staffs. Productivity and corporate profits have soared. But companies don’t want to add workers until they’re confident that consumers are spending enough to support higher sales.

Other factors are restraining hiring, too. More sophisticated software lets managers scrutinize changes in their businesses minute-by-minute. They can postpone hiring until they’re certain they need more workers.

Employers have good reason to wait, says economist Ken Mayland at ClearView Economics. A political standoff over the federal debt limit threatens to send the U.S. government into default next month. That would send interest rates soaring and might tip the economy back into recession.

Even if President Barack Obama and congressional Republicans agree to raise the borrowing limit, the deal will likely require deep cuts in government spending and possibly tax increases. Combined, those steps could slow the economy further.

The economy has already lost 493,000 government jobs since the recession ended, most of them eliminated by cash-short cities and counties. Now it faces the prospect of big cuts by the federal government, too.

Heightening the uncertainty are Europe’s debt crisis and the possibility that China’s efforts to tame inflation will slow its booming economy. Both factors could destabilize financial markets and reduce U.S. exports, one of the economy’s few strengths.

“Why would an employer hire now?” Mayland says. “It’s hunker down and wait and see.”

The Federal Reserve has already lowered short-term interest rates to near zero. And last month, it ended a Treasury bond-purchase program that was intended to strengthen the economy.

Congress, pointing to high budget deficits, won’t consider spending taxpayer money to jolt the economy with new government programs.

“We have painted ourselves into a corner,” Mayland says. “When you’re at zero interest rates and running a $1.5 trillion deficit, you don’t really have many policy options.”

Many analysts say the economy mainly needs time to recover from an implosion of the real estate market and a devastating financial crisis.

Normally, housing and construction would fuel a recovery. Lower interest rates would draw homebuyers into the market. Increased demand would encourage builders to hire construction workers and put up new houses.

Not so this time. Home prices are continuing to fall as banks dump foreclosed homes on the market. People’s home equity has shrunk.

The tepid recovery is taking a toll on consumers, whose spending accounts for 70 percent of economic activity. The Conference Board business group said last week that its consumer confidence index fell to 58.5 in June. A healthy reading is 90. At this point after the previous three recessions, the index averaged 87.

The low reading suggests consumers will be wary about spending. That could leave businesses even more cautious about hiring.

Businesses are nervous about the economic outlook now that the Fed and Congress seem to have ended their efforts to stimulate growth, says David Rosenberg, chief economist at Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

“The policy cupboard is pretty bare, and we can see what the emperor looks like disrobed,” Rosenberg says. “It’s not a pretty picture.”

Source

June 25, 2011

Roseman: Direct Energy exposes customer data to public scrutiny

Filed under: Uncategorized, economics — Tags: , , , — Professor Besto @ 9:24 pm

Some customers who submitted comments through Direct Energy

June 11, 2011

Budget deficit moves closer to $1 trillion mark

Filed under: economics, term — Tags: , , , — Professor Besto @ 7:04 am

The federal budget deficit is on pace to break the $1 trillion mark for a third straight year, putting pressure on Congress and the Obama administration to come up with a plan to rein in government spending.

The deficit through the first eight months of this budget year totaled $927.4 billion, the Treasury Department said Friday. Three years ago that would have ranked as the highest ever for a full year. Instead, it is running almost even with last year’s pace, when the deficit grew to $1.29 trillion, and behind the 2009 deficit that hit a record $1.41 trillion.

The imbalance for May was $57.6 billion, compared to $135.9 billion for the same month last year. But much of that improvement came from a $45 billion write down in the estimated cost of the financial bailout program.

Soaring deficits have prompted Republicans to insist on deep spending cuts before agreeing to raise the $14.3 trillion borrowing limit, which the government hit in May.

A new Washington Post-ABC News poll showed that a large majority of Americans believe the country could suffer serious harm if Congress fails to broaden the government’s borrowing authority. But barely half of those polled said they support such an increase.

The White House and Democrats want to trim the deficit through spending cuts and also by ending tax cuts for the wealthy, which were first passed when President George W. Bush was in office and later extended by Obama.

Republicans reject that approach, saying it amounts to a tax increase. Their plan would focus exclusively on cutting spending. They have also proposed further tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans.

The government had a surplus of $127 billion in 2001, the year President George W. Bush took office. It was projected to run surpluses totaling $5.6 trillion over the next decade.

But by 2002, the country was back in the red. The deficits grew after Bush won approval for broad tax cuts, pushed a major drug benefit program for seniors _ which wasn’t offset with revenue to pay for it _ and the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan were launched.

In 2008, Bush’s last full year in office, the deficit had grown to $454.8 billion, a record at the time. And when the economy soured, it jumped into the $1 trillion-plus range.

The Bush administration pushed a $700 billion bailout program in 2008 to rescue the nation’s banks, financial firms and automakers. The following year, the Obama administration continued the bailouts and also backed a $787 billion stimulus program to boost the economy.

Higher spending for unemployment insurance and food stamps, and the sharp contraction in tax revenues, also widened the deficit. And it grew even more this year after Obama and congressional Republicans signed off on a deal that extended the Bush tax cuts for two years and also reduced Social Security payroll taxes for one year.

Source

« Older PostsNewer Posts »

Powered by WordPress